Radiometric Dating Does Work!
A Summary of the Million Dollar RATE Research Project Radioisotopes and the Age of Datkng Earth. Rocks and fossils do not come with dates on them. In fact, the very concept of strata representing long ages does not come from the datign strata themselves. That concept began with eighteenth-century French naturalist Georges Cuvier, picked up steam with Charles Lyell, and it has been in vogue ever since.
This is despite the fact that it causes more problems for interpreting rock strata than it solves. And today we know through lab experiments and natural disasters such as the eruption of Mt. Helens that major layering of rock strata can happen catastrophically in a short period of time. The resulting rock radiometric dating mount st helens may harbor fossils from a particular habitat area or ecosystem, but do not helrns a particular age or era.
Why else do we find marine fossils on the tops of all the major mountain ranges? An examination of sedimentary rocks worldwide shows a striking consistency with the unimaginably massive Flood that wiped out whole environments. It caused massive sedimentary layering and sorting and fossilizing of the creatures buried therein. Also remember that modern disasters on a radiometric dating mount st helens scale like Mount St.
Yes, we all have been inundated with teaching that rocks are dated the millions and billions of years, but are they really? Rqdiometric is the real science behind dating of rocks? Do they really NEED to be millions or billions eating years old? The standard Geological Column became the reference point, even though it does not appear anywhere on earth except in text books.
And the ages assigned to the layers were derived from long age evolutionary assumptions — not from the scientific facts, — as the column was established long before we even had radiometric dating. Yet the column and its assumptions are used along with index fossils to assign dates to sedimentary rock monut and which in turn is used to date any fossil in that rock layer. Unfortunately, uniformitarianism has gripped geology academia and no radiometric dating mount st helens viewpoints are allowed.
This evolutionary assumption has become a naturalistic religion, an ideology established already rwdiometric Darwin published his book in These dating methods rely on a series of assumptions about the amounts of the parent-daughter elements, and a constant rate of decay. Radioisotope dating, using the trace amounts of radioactive radiometric dating mount st helens within dzting rock, was quickly accepted as proof the earth radiometric dating mount st helens millions and millions of years old.
So what does radiometric dating really do? How does it work? It has been accepted that a rock is formed when it first cools down from a molten or semi-molten state, which may include a variety of elements, including radioactive ones. The Radioactive elements decay from heavier larger atomic elements parent into smaller atomic elements daughter that are more stable. For example, Uranium U decays into Lead Pb.
This was confirmed in For the last years we have been able to measure the decay rate, and during raadiometric time it has been very steady, very radiometrci. This method is used only on hekens and igneous rocks — not sedimentary rocks which are rocks laid down by water — and is where the fossils are primarily found. The helwns calculations are based on a series of Assumptions:.
A year sample of decay rates is inadequate when talking about millions of years. We radiometric dating mount st helens not know for sure if the rate of decay was the same years ago, let alone 10, years ago, or millions of years ago. Has there been contamination into the rock of either extra amounts of parent or daughter elements? What if extra lead leached into radiometrlc rock? Or U washed out? This is assumed to datingg immaterial, but can change the end results drastically.
What is the real initial percentages of the U parent and Pb lead daughter elements? To assume the rock starts wt only U and no Pb is a big assumption. Isochron dating, which relies on multiple rock samples, is hiv poz gay dating sites attempt to correct this, but still has underlying assumptions based on 1 and 2 above. Sedimentary rocks make up the layers of the Grand Canyon and these are not dateable by radiometric dating.
The Cardenas Basalt bottom layer below the Cambrian explosion is usually dated with Rhobidium -Strontium and calculated to be about 1 billion years old. Much later after the Grand canyon was already formed, igneous rocks were formed from a volcano on top of the canyon, that Indians saw erupt, only about years ago. The volcano lava flows have Indian artifacts in them, and go over the canyon walls. These rocks were dated using the same ddating in the lab and were assigned an age of 1.
How can the very top, volcanic rock be older than the very bottom layer basalt rock? Even evolutionists admit that those Indian artifacts are not radiometric dating mount st helens. This is a real and common problem with radiometric dating techniques. ALL of the samples taken from volcanic eruptions of known times and dates are carefully collected and sent to the labs.
Then they ALWAYS come back dated at ,s to millions of years old. NEVER raddiometric they come back from the lab, with the note: Too young to measure. It is a definite pattern. Not very scientifically consistent is it? This has been known for many decades. It is the prime reason many scientists have had doubts about radiometric dating all along.
But recently, the RATE research heelens has conclusively demonstrated with independent lines of evidence that radioactive decay rates, widely used to bolster deep time, were dramatically accelerated in the past. RATE found 3 indicators that strongly indicate decay rates changed in radiomettric past, all pointing to a young age for the rocks and the earth.
This Sh is released into the crystal and rock. Helium atoms are pretty thin and can seep through solid rock. But even for He, this takes some time. The speed of Helium diffusion through solid rock has been measured. If long -age evolutionary guesses of the original amount of U are correct, then we can calculate how much Helium should have been produced and then seeped out of the crystal. If the granite is billions of years old, only the most recent Helium would still be trying to work its way out of datibg rock.